Washington signals tougher stance on Tehran’s oil exports
Washington - Former US President Donald Trump is reportedly considering a naval blockade aimed at restricting Iran’s oil exports, a move that could significantly escalate tensions in the Middle East and disrupt global energy markets.
According to sources familiar with the discussions, the proposal is being reviewed as part of a broader strategy to increase economic and strategic pressure on Tehran amid renewed concerns over Iran’s regional activities and nuclear ambitions.
Oil exports in focus
Iran relies heavily on oil sales, particularly to Asian markets, to sustain its economy. Any attempt to enforce a naval blockade would target shipping routes in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint through which a large share of the world’s oil supply passes.
Analysts warn that even the threat of such action could push oil prices higher and raise insurance costs for commercial shipping in the region.
Regional tensions already high
The reported consideration comes as the Middle East faces fresh instability, including ongoing conflicts in Gaza, Red Sea shipping attacks linked to regional proxy groups, and rising friction between Iran and Israel. In recent weeks, the United States has increased its naval presence in the region, citing the need to protect freedom of navigation.
Iran, meanwhile, has warned that any attempt to block its oil exports would be met with a strong response, reiterating its long-standing position that the Strait of Hormuz must remain open.
Global reaction and risks
International observers say a naval blockade would raise serious legal and diplomatic questions, as well as the risk of direct military confrontation. US allies in Europe and Asia are closely monitoring the situation, concerned about energy security and the broader impact on global trade.
While no final decision has been announced, the discussion itself signals a potential shift toward a more confrontational approach if Trump returns to power, with Iran once again at the center of US foreign policy debates.
